Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2006UCF
—
Steven Moffett shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
37.5
Season Value
68.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · UCF
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Steven Moffett, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · UCF. Steven Moffett shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
UCF paired 24 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2006 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
0.8
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
37.5
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 3. Florida: 0. South Florida: 1. Southern Miss: 1. Marshall: 1. Pittsburgh: 0. Houston: 0. Memphis: 2. Tulane: 0. UAB: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
— vs UAB
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs UAB | W 31-22 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Tulane | L 9-10 | 6 | 15 | 57 | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Memphis | W 26-24 | 19 | 28 | 319 | 67.9 | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Houston | L 31-51 | 9 | 13 | 75 | 69.2 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Pittsburgh | L 7-52 | 5 | 10 | 52 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | — | 4 | -5 | -1.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Wed 10/4 | @ Marshall | W 23-22 | 13 | 19 | 165 | 68.4 | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | -4 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| Tue 9/26 | vs Southern Miss | L 14-19 | 18 | 31 | 191 | 58.1 | 1 | 1 | — | 6 | 2 | 0.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs South Florida | L 17-24 | 19 | 44 | 219 | 43.2 | 1 | 2 | — | 8 | 10 | 1.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Florida | L 0-42 | 14 | 32 | 100 | 43.8 | 0 | 0 | — | 7 | -10 | -1.40 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 15 | 20 | 199 | 75.0 | 3 | 0 | — | 4 | -3 | -0.80 | 0 | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UCF
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | UCF | 11 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | UCF | 24 | — | — | 13 |
| 2006 Regular Season | UCF | 8 | — | — | -16 |
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Primary metric
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
Ohio
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
Akron
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Northern Illinois
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Nevada
3
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · UCF
24 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
85.1
#2
2004 Regular Season · UCF
80.9
11 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · UCF
68.8
8 primary · — efficiency · — usage
14
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8439
Northwestern · Miami, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Steven Moffett quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit