Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2006UAB
—
Chris Williams shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
42
Season Value
71
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Williams, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · UAB. Chris Williams shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
UAB paired 1 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2006 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
1.3
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
42
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 0. East Carolina: 2. Georgia: 0. Mississippi State: 1. Memphis: 2. Rice: 4. Marshall: 2. SMU: 0. UTEP: 1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
— vs UTEP
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/11 | vs UTEP | L 17-36 | 4 | 6 | 43 | 66.7 | 1 | 0 | — | 5 | 28 | 5.60 | 0 | 11 |
| Wed 11/1 | @ SMU | L 9-22 | 18 | 36 | 133 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | — | 11 | 18 | 1.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Marshall | L 24-31 | 18 | 30 | 205 | 60.0 | 1 | 2 | — | 10 | 8 | 0.80 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Rice | L 33-34 | 15 | 28 | 288 | 53.6 | 4 | 0 | — | 7 | 32 | 4.60 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Memphis | W 35-29 | 12 | 20 | 134 | 60.0 | 1 | 2 | — | 9 | 31 | 3.40 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Mississippi State | L 10-16 | 9 | 20 | 99 | 45.0 | 0 | 2 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Georgia | L 0-34 | 5 | 10 | 46 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 5 | -17 | -3.40 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs East Carolina | W 17-12 | 12 | 16 | 144 | 75.0 | 2 | 0 | — | 7 | 13 | 1.90 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Oklahoma | L 17-24 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2005-2006
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | UAB | 1 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | UAB | 12 | — | — | 11 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Rice
4
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
#3
Marshall
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Memphis
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
East Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · UAB
1 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2006 Regular Season · UAB
71
12 primary · — efficiency · — usage
2
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7748
Damascus · Damascus, MD
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Chris Williams quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit