Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
lowfeatured
Player Dossier
2004-2006Tulsa
Cauvey Jackson
—
Impact contributor
Cauvey Jackson shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Impact Production
—
Production sample still building
lowelite
Reliability
7
Sporadic game-to-game production
lowhigh
Star Power
51
Limited ceiling signals so far
limitedstar
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Tulsa
040506
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Unique Seasons
- 3
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Missouri State
2★
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Cauvey Jackson, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Tulsa. Cauvey Jackson shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Quick Answers
Cauvey Jackson quick answers
- Latest team and position
- Tulsa · Position unavailable
- Career Touchdowns
- 0
- Tracked sample
- 3 unique seasons · 3 entries · 17 games
- Best season
- 2005 Regular Season · Tulsa
- Top game
- Missouri State
- Recruit profile
- 2-star · Gadsden City
- High school pipeline
- Lutheran Of St Charles County · 5 FBS recruits · 1 drafted player
- Latest roster
- Class 2006
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | TD | Primary | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Tulsa | 2 | 0 | 1 | 41.7 |
| 2005 Regular Season | Tulsa | 9 | 0 | 3 | 53.7 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Tulsa | 6 | 0 | 1 | 19.5 |
Related Context
Keep exploring Cauvey Jackson
Cauvey Jackson is listed for Tulsa. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 3 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2006 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2005 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
0.3
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
7.4
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 0. Oklahoma: 0. North Texas: 2. Memphis: 0. Houston: 0. Southern Miss: 0. Rice: 0. East Carolina: 1. Tulane: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.5 · Games = 6 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · -0.5 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
— vs Tulane
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/19 | @ Tulane | W 38-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 43 | 6.10 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs East Carolina | W 45-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 74 | 10.60 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Rice | W 41-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 0.70 | 0 | 3 |
| Sun 10/9 | @ Southern Miss | W 34-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 15 | 3.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Houston | L 23-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 28 | 5.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Memphis | W 37-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 13 | 4.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ North Texas | W 54-2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 49 | 7 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Oklahoma | L 15-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Minnesota | L 10-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 17 | 2.40 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
200420052006
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Tulsa | 3 | — | — | 2 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1 | — | — | -2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
vs Missouri State
Week 5 · W 49-7
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
@ North Texas
Week 3 · W 54-2
2
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
vs Southern Miss
Week 6 · W 20-6 · Conference game
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
vs East Carolina
Week 11 · W 45-13 · Conference game
1
Touchdowns
50 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
@ Hawai'i
Week 6 · L 16-44 · Conference game
0
Touchdowns
0 takeover
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2005 Regular Season · Tulsa
3 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
53.7
#2
2004 Regular Season · Tulsa
41.7
1 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · Tulsa
19.5
1 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Keep exploring Cauvey Jackson
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.