Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2006Tennessee
—
Bret Smith shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
13.3
Season Value
56.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bret Smith, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Tennessee. Bret Smith shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Tennessee paired 5 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2006 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
0.5
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
13.3
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. California: 0. Florida: 0. Marshall: 0. Memphis: 1. Georgia: 1. Alabama: 0. South Carolina: 2. Arkansas: 1. Vanderbilt: 0. Kentucky: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
— vs Kentucky
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs Kentucky | W 17-12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Vanderbilt | W 39-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Arkansas | L 14-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ South Carolina | W 31-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Alabama | W 16-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Georgia | W 51-33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Memphis | W 41-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Marshall | W 33-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | vs Florida | L 20-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs California | W 35-18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tennessee
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Tennessee | 5 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Tennessee | 3 | — | — | -2 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Tennessee | 5 | — | — | 2 |
#1 Featured game
Louisiana Tech
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Primary metric
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
Notre Dame
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
LSU
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Florida
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
South Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2006 Regular Season · Tennessee
5 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
56.7
#2
2005 Regular Season · Tennessee
56.3
3 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2004 Regular Season · Tennessee
55.6
5 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8267
Port Huron · Port Huron, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Bret Smith quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit