Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2007Michigan State
—
Stephen Reaves shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
12.5
Season Value
56.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Stephen Reaves, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Michigan State. Stephen Reaves shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 2 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2007 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2007 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan State, Southern Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
0.5
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
12.5
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Tennessee: 0. Boise State: 0. Rice: 1. SMU: 2. Marshall: 1. UCF: 0. UAB: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
— vs UAB
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/3 | @ UAB | W 37-7 | 4 | 7 | 23 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Mon 10/29 | vs UCF | L 17-34 | 20 | 29 | 144 | 69.0 | 0 | 3 | — | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
| Mon 10/22 | @ Marshall | W 33-24 | 23 | 30 | 310 | 76.7 | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | -9 | -9 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs SMU | W 28-7 | 18 | 26 | 206 | 69.2 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| Thu 10/4 | vs Rice | L 29-31 | 24 | 44 | 231 | 54.5 | 1 | 4 | — | 4 | -29 | -7.30 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu 9/27 | @ Boise State | L 16-38 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 37.5 | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Tennessee | L 19-39 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | -20 | -20 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 3 | 7 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | -6 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2004
Opening stop
Southern Miss
2006-2007
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Michigan State | 2 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 2 | — | — | 0 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 4 | — | — | 2 |
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Central Michigan
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
UAB
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Memphis
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
SMU
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2004 Regular Season · Michigan State
2 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
75
#2
2007 Regular Season · Southern Miss
56.3
4 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · Southern Miss
55.6
2 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8683
St. John's Jesuit · Toledo, OH
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Stephen Reaves quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit