Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2006-2008Tulsa
—
Courtney Tennial shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
56.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Tulsa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Courtney Tennial, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Tulsa. Courtney Tennial shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 16 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2008 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
0.6
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 1. New Mexico: 0. Unknown: 3. Rice: 1. SMU: 0. UTEP: 0. UCF: 2. Arkansas: 0. Houston: 0. Tulane: 0. East Carolina: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
— vs East Carolina
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/6 | vs East Carolina | L 24-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 2.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Tulane | W 56-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 32 | 6.40 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ Houston | L 30-70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9 | 59 | 6.60 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Arkansas | L 23-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9 | 39 | 4.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Mon 10/27 | vs UCF | W 49-19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 35 | 7 | 2 | 18 |
| Sun 10/19 | vs UTEP | W 77-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 37 | 7.40 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/12 | @ SMU | W 37-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 10/5 | vs Rice | W 63-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 1 | 2 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs New Mexico | W 56-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 2.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ UAB | W 45-22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulsa
2006-2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Tulsa | 16 | — | — | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | -16 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulsa | 7 | — | — | 7 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
3
Primary metric
3 primary-metric impact.
#2
Memphis
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#3
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#4
Tulane
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2006 Regular Season · Tulsa
16 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
79.9
#2
2008 Regular Season · Tulsa
56.1
7 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Tulsa
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
6
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7
Wilson Magnet · Rochester, NY
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Courtney Tennial quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit