Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2005Texas A&M
—
Reggie McNeal shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
45.5
Season Value
72.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Reggie McNeal, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Reggie McNeal shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 22 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2005 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
1.9
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
45.5
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 1. SMU: 6. Unknown: 2. Baylor: 0. Colorado: 0. Oklahoma State: 4. Kansas State: 2. Iowa State: 1. Texas Tech: 1. Oklahoma: 2
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
— vs Oklahoma
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/12 | @ Oklahoma | L 30-36 | 12 | 29 | 158 | 41.4 | 2 | 1 | — | 7 | -2 | -0.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 11/6 | @ Texas Tech | L 17-56 | 15 | 24 | 131 | 62.5 | 1 | 1 | — | 8 | 26 | 3.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Iowa State | L 14-42 | 23 | 39 | 221 | 59.0 | 1 | 2 | — | 10 | 16 | 1.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Kansas State | W 30-28 | 15 | 31 | 136 | 48.4 | 1 | 1 | — | 16 | 119 | 7.40 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Oklahoma State | W 62-23 | 18 | 26 | 263 | 69.2 | 3 | 1 | — | 12 | 150 | 12.50 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Colorado | L 20-41 | 10 | 21 | 146 | 47.6 | 0 | 0 | — | 5 | -14 | -2.80 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Baylor | W 16-13 | 12 | 31 | 132 | 38.7 | 0 | 2 | — | 12 | 83 | 6.90 | 0 | 39 |
| Fri 9/23 | vs Unknown | — | 13 | 24 | 317 | 54.2 | 2 | 0 | — | 11 | 86 | 7.80 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs SMU | W 66-8 | 15 | 24 | 349 | 62.5 | 5 | 0 | — | 6 | 100 | 16.70 | 1 | 63 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Clemson | L 24-25 | 8 | 16 | 110 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | — | 9 | 100 | 11.10 | 0 | 49 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2004-2005
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 22 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 19 | — | — | -3 |
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma State
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4
Primary metric
4 primary-metric impact.
#2
Iowa State
4
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
#3
SMU
6
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
6 primary-metric impact.
#4
Oklahoma
3
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#5
Oklahoma State
4
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2004 Regular Season · Texas A&M
22 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
81.4
#2
2005 Regular Season · Texas A&M
72.8
19 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.905
Buena Park · Buena Park, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Reggie McNeal quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit