Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2005Temple
—
Umar Ferguson shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
43.3
Season Value
71.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Temple
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Umar Ferguson, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Temple. Umar Ferguson shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Temple paired 5 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2005 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
0.6
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
43.3
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 1. Wisconsin: 0. Western Michigan: 1. Maryland: 1. Miami: 0. Clemson: 0. Miami (OH): 2. Navy: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
— vs Navy
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/19 | @ Navy | L 17-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22 | 116 | 5.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Miami (OH) | L 14-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 48 | 3.20 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Clemson | L 7-37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17 | 48 | 2.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Miami | L 3-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 | 77 | 3.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Maryland | L 7-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25 | 96 | 3.80 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Western Michigan | L 16-19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33 | 110 | 3.30 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Wisconsin | L 0-65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 32 | 2.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Arizona State | L 16-63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 42 | 2.60 | 0 | 14 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Temple
2004-2005
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Temple | 2 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Temple | 5 | — | — | 3 |
#1 Featured game
Florida A&M
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Primary metric
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
Miami (OH)
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
Maryland
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Western Michigan
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Arizona State
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Temple
5 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
71.7
#2
2004 Regular Season · Temple
51.9
2 primary · — efficiency · — usage
2
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7544
Grant Union · Sacramento, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Umar Ferguson quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit