Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2005Wisconsin
—
Brian Calhoun shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
36.9
Season Value
68.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Wisconsin
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brian Calhoun, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Wisconsin. Brian Calhoun shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Wisconsin paired 24 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
1.8
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
36.9
Best Game by takeover score
Auburn
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 1. Bowling Green: 5. Temple: 1. North Carolina: 2. Michigan: 1. Indiana: 1. Northwestern: 1. Minnesota: 3. Purdue: 2. Illinois: 5. Penn State: 1. Iowa: 0. Hawai'i: 1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
— vs Auburn
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ Auburn | W 24-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30 | 213 | 7.10 | 1 | 60 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Hawai'i | W 41-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 29 | 149 | 5.10 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Iowa | L 10-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 18 | 1.20 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Penn State | L 14-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 38 | 1.90 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Illinois | W 41-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 35 | 197 | 5.60 | 5 | 46 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Purdue | W 31-20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 20 | 62 | 3.10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Minnesota | W 38-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 | 110 | 4.80 | 3 | 18 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Northwestern | L 48-51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 | 122 | 5.30 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Indiana | W 41-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26 | 101 | 3.90 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Michigan | W 23-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 35 | 155 | 4.40 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ North Carolina | W 14-5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 38 | 171 | 4.50 | 2 | 26 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Temple | W 65-0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11 | 42 | 3.80 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Bowling Green | W 56-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 43 | 258 | 6 | 5 | 20 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wisconsin
2005
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 24 | — | — | — |
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
5
Primary metric
5 primary-metric impact.
#2
Bowling Green
5
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
5 primary-metric impact.
#3
Minnesota
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#4
Purdue
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
North Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Wisconsin
24 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
68.5
3
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8397
John Tyler · Tyler, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Brian Calhoun quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit