Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2006Buffalo
Chad Upshaw
—
Impact contributor
Chad Upshaw shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
2.8
Season Value
51.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Buffalo
040506
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chad Upshaw, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Buffalo. Chad Upshaw shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 3 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2006 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2006 Regular Season · Buffalo
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
0.1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
2.8
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Auburn: 0. Ball State: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Ohio: 0. Boston College: 0. Kent State: 0. Akron: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Central Michigan: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins0 · n=2 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses10 · n=10 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half0 · n=6 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half16.7 · n=6 · +0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
— vs Central Michigan
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/24 | vs Central Michigan | L 28-55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Wisconsin | L 3-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 11/9 | @ Akron | L 16-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Kent State | W 41-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Boston College | L 0-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Ohio | L 7-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Miami (OH) | L 31-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Ball State | L 25-55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Auburn | L 7-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Northern Illinois | L 13-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Bowling Green | L 40-48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Temple | W 9-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Progression
200420052006
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Buffalo | 2 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Buffalo | 3 | — | — | 1 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Buffalo | 1 | — | — | -2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Akron
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Eastern Michigan
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Toledo
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Western Michigan
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Buffalo
3 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
55
#2
2004 Regular Season · Buffalo
54.8
2 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · Buffalo
51.4
1 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
6
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8481
Topeka · Topeka, KS
- Committed To
- Kansas State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.