Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2006Central Michigan
—
Obed Cetoute shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
56.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Obed Cetoute, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Obed Cetoute shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2006 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
0.5
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 0. Boston College: 0. Akron: 0. Kentucky: 0. Toledo: 2. Bowling Green: 1. Temple: 1. Western Michigan: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Buffalo: 0. Ohio: 1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
— vs Middle Tennessee
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/27 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 31-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 12/1 | @ Ohio | W 31-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | @ Buffalo | W 55-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Northern Illinois | L 10-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Western Michigan | W 31-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Temple | W 42-26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 10/19 | vs Bowling Green | W 31-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Toledo | W 42-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Kentucky | L 36-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Akron | W 24-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Boston College | L 24-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 2 | — | — | 2 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 5 | — | — | 3 |
#1 Featured game
Northern Illinois
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Miami (OH)
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Toledo
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Ohio
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Temple
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2004 Regular Season · Central Michigan
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2006 Regular Season · Central Michigan
56.1
5 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2005 Regular Season · Central Michigan
53.7
2 primary · — efficiency · — usage
3
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7483
Finland · Finland
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Obed Cetoute quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit