Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2005Purdue
—
Brandon Kirsch shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
58.6
Season Value
79.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Purdue
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Kirsch, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Purdue. Brandon Kirsch shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Purdue paired 8 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2005 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
58.6
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Akron: 2. Arizona: 0. Minnesota: 2. Notre Dame: 2. Iowa: 1. Northwestern: 0. Penn State: 1. Indiana: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
— vs Indiana
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/19 | @ Indiana | W 41-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Penn State | L 15-33 | 11 | 21 | 102 | 52.4 | 0 | 1 | — | 4 | 9 | 2.30 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Northwestern | L 29-34 | 37 | 58 | 360 | 63.8 | 0 | 2 | — | 11 | 28 | 2.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Iowa | L 17-34 | 31 | 50 | 353 | 62.0 | 1 | 1 | — | 7 | 23 | 3.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Notre Dame | L 28-49 | 29 | 44 | 274 | 65.9 | 2 | 1 | — | 6 | 47 | 7.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Minnesota | L 35-42 | 15 | 34 | 246 | 44.1 | 2 | 2 | — | 5 | 24 | 4.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Arizona | W 31-24 | 7 | 16 | 140 | 43.8 | 0 | 1 | — | 8 | 54 | 6.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Akron | W 49-24 | 22 | 34 | 252 | 64.7 | 2 | 0 | — | 6 | 3 | 0.50 | 0 | 5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2004-2005
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Purdue | 8 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Purdue | 8 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Iowa
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
3
Primary metric
3 primary-metric impact.
#2
Notre Dame
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
Minnesota
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Akron
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Ohio State
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Purdue
8 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
79.3
#2
2004 Regular Season · Purdue
73
8 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7652
Tuscaloosa County · Northport, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Brandon Kirsch quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit