Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2006Michigan State
—
Matt Trannon shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
55.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Matt Trannon, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Michigan State. Matt Trannon shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 5 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2006 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
0.6
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Idaho: 0. Eastern Michigan: 3. Pittsburgh: 0. Notre Dame: 1. Michigan: 0. Indiana: 0. Purdue: 0. Minnesota: 1. Penn State: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
— vs Penn State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/18 | @ Penn State | L 13-17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Minnesota | L 18-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Purdue | L 15-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Indiana | L 21-46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Michigan | L 13-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/24 | vs Notre Dame | L 37-40 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Pittsburgh | W 38-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 52-20 | 1 | 1 | 35 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Idaho | W 27-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Michigan State | 2 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Michigan State | 4 | — | — | 2 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Michigan State | 5 | — | — | 1 |
#1 Featured game
Wisconsin
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Rutgers
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Notre Dame
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Eastern Michigan
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#5
Illinois
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2006 Regular Season · Michigan State
5 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
55.6
#2
2005 Regular Season · Michigan State
55
4 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2004 Regular Season · Michigan State
53.4
2 primary · — efficiency · — usage
4
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7667
Elmira · Elmira, OR
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Matt Trannon quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit