Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2006Michigan State
Drew Stanton
—
Impact contributor
Drew Stanton shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
34.7
Season Value
67.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Michigan State
040506
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Michigan State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drew Stanton, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Michigan State. Drew Stanton shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 23 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2006 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2006 Regular Season · Michigan State
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
1.5
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
34.7
Best Game by takeover score
Minnesota
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Idaho: 1. Eastern Michigan: 5. Pittsburgh: 3. Notre Dame: 2. Illinois: 0. Michigan: 1. Ohio State: 0. Northwestern: 3. Indiana: 1. Purdue: 1. Minnesota: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins60 · n=4 · +2.3 vs Losses
Losses14.3 · n=7 · -2.3 vs Wins
First Half40 · n=6 · +1 vs Second Half
Second Half20 · n=5 · -1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
— vs Minnesota
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/11 | vs Minnesota | L 18-31 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | -5 | -1.30 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Purdue | L 15-17 | 16 | 29 | 161 | 55.2 | 1 | 1 | — | 13 | 83 | 6.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Indiana | L 21-46 | 10 | 22 | 100 | 45.5 | 1 | 1 | — | 8 | 34 | 4.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Northwestern | W 41-38 | 27 | 37 | 294 | 73.0 | 2 | 1 | — | 9 | 37 | 4.10 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Ohio State | L 7-38 | 8 | 16 | 54 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | — | 7 | -6 | -0.90 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Michigan | L 13-31 | 20 | 35 | 252 | 57.1 | 0 | 2 | — | 7 | 24 | 3.40 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Illinois | L 20-23 | 15 | 24 | 144 | 62.5 | 0 | 0 | — | 13 | 32 | 2.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 9/24 | vs Notre Dame | L 37-40 | 10 | 22 | 114 | 45.5 | 2 | 2 | — | 19 | 53 | 2.80 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Pittsburgh | W 38-23 | 16 | 25 | 198 | 64.0 | 2 | 1 | — | 13 | 105 | 8.10 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 52-20 | 24 | 32 | 254 | 75.0 | 3 | 1 | — | 9 | 33 | 3.70 | 2 | 11 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Idaho | W 27-17 | 16 | 25 | 225 | 64.0 | 1 | 0 | — | 8 | 55 | 6.90 | 0 | 17 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Progression
200420052006
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Michigan State | 14 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Michigan State | 23 | — | — | 9 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Michigan State | 17 | — | — | -6 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4
Primary metric
4 primary-metric impact.
#2
Illinois
5
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
5 primary-metric impact.
#3
Eastern Michigan
5
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
5 primary-metric impact.
#4
Notre Dame
4
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
#5
Minnesota
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Michigan State
23 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
83.7
#2
2004 Regular Season · Michigan State
69.3
14 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · Michigan State
67.4
17 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
8
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7667
Hamilton · Chandler, AZ
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.