Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2006Michigan
Steve Breaston
—
Impact contributor
Steve Breaston shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
5.1
Season Value
52.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Michigan
040506
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Steve Breaston, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Michigan. Steve Breaston shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
Michigan paired 3 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2006 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2006 Regular Season · Michigan
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
0.2
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
5.1
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 1. Vanderbilt: 0. Central Michigan: 0. Notre Dame: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Minnesota: 0. Michigan State: 0. Penn State: 0. Iowa: 0. Northwestern: 0. Ball State: 0. Indiana: 1. Ohio State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins9.1 · n=11 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses50 · n=2 · +0.4 vs Wins
First Half14.3 · n=7 · -0.0 vs Second Half
Second Half16.7 · n=6 · +0.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
— vs USC
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | vs USC | L 18-32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Ohio State | L 39-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Indiana | W 34-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Ball State | W 34-26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Northwestern | W 17-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Iowa | W 20-6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 10/15 | @ Penn State | W 17-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Michigan State | W 31-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/1 | @ Minnesota | W 28-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Wisconsin | W 27-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Notre Dame | W 47-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Central Michigan | W 41-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Vanderbilt | W 27-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Progression
200420052006
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Michigan | 3 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Michigan | 2 | — | — | -1 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Michigan | 2 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Northwestern
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Notre Dame
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Indiana
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Iowa
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2004 Regular Season · Michigan
3 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
54.6
#2
2005 Regular Season · Michigan
53.1
2 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · Michigan
52.6
2 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
7
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7667
Catholic Central · Grand Rapids, MI
- Committed To
- Grand Valley State University
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.