Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2005Miami
—
Sinorice Moss shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
50
Season Value
75
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Miami
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sinorice Moss, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Miami. Sinorice Moss shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Miami paired 6 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2005 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
0.5
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
50
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 0. Florida State: 0. Clemson: 0. Colorado: 1. South Florida: 0. Duke: 1. Temple: 1. North Carolina: 0. Virginia Tech: 0. Wake Forest: 1. Georgia Tech: 1. Virginia: 1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Virginia
Best efficiency game
— vs LSU
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ LSU | L 3-40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Virginia | W 25-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Georgia Tech | L 10-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Wake Forest | W 47-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/6 | @ Virginia Tech | W 27-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs North Carolina | W 34-16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Temple | W 34-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Duke | W 52-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 23 | 11.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs South Florida | W 27-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Colorado | W 23-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Clemson | W 36-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Tue 9/6 | @ Florida State | L 7-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Miami
2004-2005
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Miami | 3 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Miami | 6 | — | — | 3 |
#1 Featured game
Wake Forest
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
NC State
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Florida State
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Virginia
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Georgia Tech
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Miami
6 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
75
#2
2004 Regular Season · Miami
55
3 primary · — efficiency · — usage
9
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7667
Baker · Mobile, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Sinorice Moss quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit