Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
Player Dossier
2004-2005Notre Dame
—
Rashon Powers-Neal shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
Impact Production
—
Production sample still building
Reliability
10
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
37
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Snapshot
Rashon Powers-Neal, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Rashon Powers-Neal shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | TD | Primary | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 10 | 0 | 3 | 30 |
| 2005 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 4 | 0 | 6 | 79.3 |
Related Context
Rashon Powers-Neal is listed for Notre Dame. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 6 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2004 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2005 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
0.3
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
10
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon State: 0. BYU: 0. Michigan: 1. Michigan State: 0. Washington: 0. Purdue: 1. Stanford: 0. Boston College: 0. Tennessee: 0. Pittsburgh: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
— vs Oregon State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/29 | @ Oregon State | L 21-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Pittsburgh | L 38-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Tennessee | W 17-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Boston College | L 23-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Stanford | W 23-15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Purdue | L 16-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 0.50 | 1 | 1 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Washington | W 38-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 17 | 5.70 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Michigan State | W 31-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Michigan | W 28-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/5 | @ BYU | L 17-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2004-2005
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 3 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 6 | — | — | 3 |
#1 Featured game
vs Pittsburgh
Week 12 · L 38-41
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
vs Purdue
Week 6 · L 16-41
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
vs Michigan
Week 3 · W 28-20
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
@ Pittsburgh
Week 1 · W 42-21
3
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#5
@ Purdue
Week 5 · W 49-28
2
Touchdowns
66.7 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2005 Regular Season · Notre Dame
6 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
79.3
#2
2004 Regular Season · Notre Dame
30
3 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.