Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2005UTEP
Tyler Ebell
—
Impact contributor
Tyler Ebell shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
59.6
Season Value
79.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · UTEP
05
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Ebell, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · UTEP. Tyler Ebell shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
UTEP paired 7 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2005 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
7
Primary Metric / G
1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
59.6
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 1. Houston: 1. New Mexico: 0. Memphis: 1. Tulane: 1. Marshall: 0. Rice: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins33.3 · n=6
First Half25.0 · n=4 · -0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half44.4 · n=3 · +0.6 vs First Half
All Games33.3 · n=7
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
— vs Rice
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 10/29 | @ Rice | W 38-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 96 | 6 | 2 | 18 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Marshall | W 31-3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 13 | 92 | 7.10 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Tulane | W 45-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 25 | 2.10 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 10/2 | @ Memphis | L 20-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 69 | 4.60 | 1 | 13 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs New Mexico | W 21-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19 | 42 | 2.20 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Houston | W 44-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24 | 138 | 5.80 | 1 | 27 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ New Mexico State | W 34-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19 | 63 | 3.30 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2005
Opening stop
Season Progression
2005
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | UTEP | 7 | — | — | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3
Primary metric
3 primary-metric impact.
#2
Tulane
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Memphis
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Houston
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
New Mexico State
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · UTEP
7 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
79.8
Milestones
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8168
Wichita Collegiate School · Wichita, KS
- Committed To
- Kansas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 7 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.