Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2004Tennessee
—
Cedric Houston shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
15.4
Season Value
57.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cedric Houston, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Tennessee. Cedric Houston shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
Tennessee paired 9 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2004 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
0.7
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
15.4
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 1. UNLV: 0. Florida: 0. Louisiana Tech: 2. Auburn: 0. Georgia: 0. Ole Miss: 0. Alabama: 0. South Carolina: 1. Notre Dame: 1. Vanderbilt: 3. Kentucky: 0. Auburn: 1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
— vs Texas A&M
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/1 | @ Texas A&M | W 38-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13 | 62 | 4.80 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 12/4 | vs Auburn | L 28-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11 | 37 | 3.40 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Kentucky | W 37-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24 | 127 | 5.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Vanderbilt | W 38-33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19 | 97 | 5.10 | 3 | 13 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Notre Dame | L 13-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18 | 65 | 3.60 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ South Carolina | W 43-29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 190 | 12.70 | 1 | 65 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Alabama | W 17-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 30 | 4.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/17 | @ Ole Miss | W 21-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 0.70 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Georgia | W 19-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 28 | 1.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Auburn | L 10-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 55 | 3.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 42-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 160 | 10 | 2 | 37 |
| Sun 9/19 | vs Florida | W 30-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9 | 53 | 5.90 | 0 | 15 |
| Mon 9/6 | vs UNLV | W 42-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 97 | 8.10 | 0 | 28 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tennessee
2004
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Tennessee | 9 | — | — | — |
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3
Primary metric
3 primary-metric impact.
#2
Louisiana Tech
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
Texas A&M
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Auburn
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Notre Dame
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2004 Regular Season · Tennessee
9 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
57.7
2
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.85
St Joseph Regional · Montvale, NJ
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Cedric Houston quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit