Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2004Tennessee
—
Derrick Tinsley shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
100
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Derrick Tinsley, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Tennessee. Derrick Tinsley shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
Tennessee paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2004 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 0. Florida: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. Auburn: 0. Georgia: 0. Ole Miss: 0. Alabama: 0. South Carolina: 0. Notre Dame: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
— vs Notre Dame
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/6 | vs Notre Dame | L 13-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ South Carolina | W 43-29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Alabama | W 17-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/17 | @ Ole Miss | W 21-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Georgia | W 19-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Auburn | L 10-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 42-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/19 | vs Florida | W 30-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | -6 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
| Mon 9/6 | vs UNLV | W 42-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tennessee
2004
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0
Primary metric
0 primary-metric impact.
#2
South Carolina
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#3
Alabama
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#4
Ole Miss
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#5
Georgia
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2004 Regular Season · Tennessee
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.85
Union · Vancouver, WA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 9 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Derrick Tinsley quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit