Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2005Louisiana Tech
—
Matt Kubik shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
66.9
Season Value
83.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Matt Kubik, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech. Matt Kubik shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Louisiana Tech paired 18 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2005 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
1.6
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
66.9
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 0. Kansas: 2. New Mexico State: 2. Hawai'i: 2. Nevada: 1. North Texas: 1. San José State: 1. Utah State: 2. Idaho: 3. Boise State: 1. Fresno State: 3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Fresno State
Best efficiency game
— vs Fresno State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/3 | @ Fresno State | W 40-28 | 13 | 22 | 251 | 59.1 | 3 | 0 | — | 4 | 6 | 1.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Boise State | L 13-30 | 17 | 32 | 180 | 53.1 | 1 | 0 | — | 6 | -8 | -1.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Idaho | W 41-38 | 18 | 32 | 284 | 56.3 | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.70 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Utah State | W 27-17 | 16 | 26 | 150 | 61.5 | 1 | 0 | — | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs San José State | W 31-14 | 18 | 33 | 329 | 54.5 | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | 17 | 3.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas | W 40-14 | 23 | 30 | 283 | 76.7 | 1 | 0 | — | 7 | 43 | 6.10 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Nevada | L 27-37 | 13 | 39 | 161 | 33.3 | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | -10 | -2 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Hawai'i | W 46-14 | 14 | 20 | 149 | 70.0 | 2 | 0 | — | 8 | 13 | 1.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs New Mexico State | W 34-14 | 17 | 28 | 173 | 60.7 | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Kansas | L 14-34 | 18 | 32 | 186 | 56.3 | 2 | 2 | — | 5 | 12 | 2.40 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Florida | L 3-41 | 4 | 18 | 56 | 22.2 | 0 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Louisiana Tech
2004-2005
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 12 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Louisiana Tech | 18 | — | — | 6 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3
Primary metric
3 primary-metric impact.
#2
Fresno State
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#3
Idaho
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#4
Boise State
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Tulsa
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
18 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
83.5
#2
2004 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech
77.4
12 primary · — efficiency · — usage
10
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8107
Vero Beach · Vero Beach, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Matt Kubik quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit