Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2004Auburn
—
Carnell Williams shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
73.4
Season Value
86.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Auburn
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Carnell Williams, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Auburn. Carnell Williams shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
Auburn paired 14 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2004 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
1.1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
73.4
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 0. UL Monroe: 1. Mississippi State: 2. LSU: 0. Unknown: 1. Tennessee: 1. Louisiana Tech: 1. Arkansas: 1. Kentucky: 2. Ole Miss: 1. Georgia: 2. Alabama: 1. Tennessee: 1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Georgia
Best efficiency game
— vs Virginia Tech
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/4 | vs Virginia Tech | W 16-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19 | 61 | 3.20 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 12/4 | @ Tennessee | W 38-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19 | 100 | 5.30 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Alabama | W 21-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 41 | 2.70 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Georgia | W 24-6 | 1 | 1 | 29 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | — | 19 | 101 | 5.30 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Ole Miss | W 35-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 96 | 6 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Kentucky | W 42-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17 | 149 | 8.80 | 2 | 36 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Arkansas | W 38-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 71 | 4.40 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 52-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 56 | 4.70 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Tennessee | W 34-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24 | 95 | 4 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22 | 95 | 4.30 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs LSU | W 10-9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18 | 75 | 4.20 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Mississippi State | W 43-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19 | 122 | 6.40 | 2 | 17 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs UL Monroe | W 31-0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23 | 103 | 4.50 | 0 | 20 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Auburn
2004
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Auburn | 14 | — | — | — |
#1 Featured game
Georgia
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Primary metric
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
Kentucky
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
Mississippi State
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Tennessee
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Alabama
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2004 Regular Season · Auburn
14 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
86.7
3
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8115
Netherlands · Netherlands, NETH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Carnell Williams quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit