Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2005Toledo
Bruce Gradkowski
—
Impact contributor
Bruce Gradkowski shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
75.9
Season Value
88
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Toledo
0405
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bruce Gradkowski, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Toledo. Bruce Gradkowski shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Toledo paired 33 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2005 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2005 Regular Season · Toledo
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
3
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
75.9
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTEP: 5. Unknown: 3. Western Michigan: 3. Temple: 5. Eastern Michigan: 0. Ball State: 3. Buffalo: 3. Central Michigan: 2. Ohio: 3. Northern Illinois: 2. Bowling Green: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins65 · n=8 · +1.3 vs Losses
Losses40 · n=2 · -1.3 vs Wins
First Half63.3 · n=6 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half56 · n=5 · -0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
— vs UTEP
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/22 | @ UTEP | W 45-13 | 18 | 30 | 298 | 60.0 | 5 | 2 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Wed 11/23 | @ Bowling Green | W 44-41 | 23 | 36 | 298 | 63.9 | 4 | 0 | — | 8 | 14 | 1.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Thu 11/17 | vs Northern Illinois | L 17-35 | 14 | 34 | 168 | 41.2 | 1 | 3 | — | 10 | 45 | 4.50 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Ohio | W 30-21 | 22 | 31 | 236 | 71.0 | 2 | 1 | — | 6 | 51 | 8.50 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Central Michigan | L 17-21 | 28 | 45 | 262 | 62.2 | 2 | 0 | — | 13 | 60 | 4.60 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Buffalo | W 38-15 | 16 | 21 | 186 | 76.2 | 3 | 2 | — | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Ball State | W 34-14 | 17 | 28 | 207 | 60.7 | 3 | 2 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.20 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 30-3 | 15 | 26 | 160 | 57.7 | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Temple | W 42-17 | 20 | 29 | 182 | 69.0 | 4 | 1 | — | 3 | 14 | 4.70 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Western Michigan | W 56-23 | 25 | 35 | 338 | 71.4 | 3 | 1 | — | 4 | -2 | -0.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 9 | 17 | 134 | 52.9 | 2 | 0 | — | 3 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2004-2005
Opening stop
Season Progression
20042005
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Toledo | 36 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Toledo | 33 | — | — | -3 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
6
Primary metric
6 primary-metric impact.
#2
UTEP
5
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
5 primary-metric impact.
#3
Temple
5
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
5 primary-metric impact.
#4
Eastern Michigan
5
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
5 primary-metric impact.
#5
Bowling Green
4
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Toledo
33 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
88
#2
2004 Regular Season · Toledo
76.4
36 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
13
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8685
Auburndale · Auburndale, FL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.